The recommendations focus on improving clarity and precision while maintaining the original structure and points. The main changes are: (1) Changed 'You need to explicitly check' to 'You may need to explicitly check' to be more accurate - USER_MODE does handle FLS in many cases automatically, so explicit checks aren't always required. (2) Added 'when needed' to the recommendation about explicit verification to maintain consistency with the more precise language. These changes improve accuracy without removing information or changing the FAQ's scope.
For the security rule ApexCRUDViolation: This rule is directly related because the FAQ specifically discusses FLS (Field-Level Security) issues that scanners report, and the ApexCRUDViolation rule detects violations of CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) and FLS permissions in Apex code. The FAQ's entire focus on 'FLS issue' reporting, discussion of 'USER_MODE enforces sharing rules and CRUD/FLS checks', and recommendations to 'explicitly verify field accessibility using Schema.sObjectType' directly relate to what the ApexCRUDViolation rule is designed to detect and prevent.