The FAQ content is already well-structured and accurate for its category of Proactive Security Architecture Review. The main improvement made was converting 'you are' to 'you're' in point 3 to follow the conversational tone guidelines that recommend using contractions. This makes the FAQ sound more natural and conversational while maintaining all the original information and structure.
No security rules were selected because this FAQ is about the consultation process itself - it's guidance on HOW to get security advice rather than technical security implementation details. The available security rules all focus on specific technical violations (like SOQL injection, CRUD violations, XSS issues, etc.) while this FAQ is purely procedural, explaining the process of scheduling appointments with the Product Security team. The FAQ doesn't discuss any code patterns, technical implementations, or security configurations that would trigger the scanner rules.