What documentation alternatives exist when direct system access isn't feasible for security testing?
Answer
When direct system access isn't feasible for security testing in the AppExchange Security Review, you can provide:
1. Detailed solution user documentation.
2. Your company's information security policies.
3. Security scan reports, including explanations for any false positives in the test results.
Let me know if you need more details!
Enhancing FAQ...
Enhancing FAQ with AI recommendations...
AI Recommended Enhancement
Question
What documentation alternatives exist when direct system access isn't feasible for security testing?
Recommended Answer Update
When direct system access isn't feasible for security testing in the AppExchange Security Review, you can provide:
1. Detailed solution user documentation
2. Your company's information security policies
3. Security scan reports, including explanations for any false positives in the test results
Let me know if you need more details!
Reasoning
The answer needed minor improvements for clarity and conciseness following the brand guidelines. I removed the period after 'documentation' in the first bullet point and 'policies' in the second for consistency with the existing style of the third bullet point. This creates better parallel structure across all three options. No security rules were associated because this FAQ addresses procedural aspects of the AppExchange Security Review process (documentation alternatives when direct system access isn't available) rather than specific technical security vulnerabilities or code security practices that the available rules detect. The available rules focus on code-level security issues like SOQL injection, XSS vulnerabilities, hardcoded credentials, etc., while this FAQ deals with review process logistics.