To discuss potential vulnerabilities in sample code and handle security findings related to demonstration or example code for the AppExchange Security Review:
**General Approach:**
- Ensure all sample, example, or demonstration code follows the same security standards as production code
- Replace insecure elements (e.g., direct DOM manipulation like `document.createElement`) with secure alternatives, such as template directives or protected custom metadata settings
- Securely store or remove any sensitive data in the example code
- Avoid insecure practices like exposing user session IDs or storing sensitive information in unprotected locations
**Justifying False Positives:**
To justify that "Sample Code in Production Vulnerability" findings are false positives:
1. **Location**: Clearly identify where the flagged code is located
2. **Explanation**: Provide a detailed rationale explaining why the code does not pose a security risk. For example, clarify that the sample code is strictly for educational or testing purposes and is not used in production
3. **Special Use Cases**: If there are any unique circumstances or exceptions, include them to validate the safety of the flagged code
4. **Documentation**: Include detailed explanations in the false positives documentation, such as the target URL, class name, location, and justification for why the issue is not a security risk
5. **Document Thoroughly**: If flagged findings are not exploitable or relevant to actual functionality, document them as false positives with comprehensive explanations
**Additional Resources:**
- For further guidance, you can schedule a technical office hours appointment with the Product Security team through the Partner Security Portal
- Make sure your documentation is thorough and follows the false-positive reporting guidelines to help the security review team assess your justification
Let me know if you need further assistance!