FAQ-000731 - Data Storage and Encryption Security / Vulnerability Identification and Remediation

Resolving insecure storage vulnerabilities depends on the changes needed: **Patch Release**: If the issue can be fixed within the existing package without changing the package ID or namespace, it can be included in a patch release. **New Version**: If the fix involves creating new components (e.g., replacing public custom settings with protected ones) or making significant structural changes, a new package version is required. This will also need a follow-up security review. Ensure all references to old, vulnerable components are replaced, and thoroughly test the updated package before submission.

The FAQ content is accurate and well-structured, providing clear guidance on when to use patch releases versus new versions for insecure storage vulnerability fixes. The main improvement is removing the redundant phrase 'This will also need a follow-up security review' from the New Version section, as this is already established context for AppExchange security review processes and doesn't add value to the specific guidance being provided. The rest of the content effectively addresses the core question about resolution options. I selected the ProtectSensitiveData rule because this FAQ directly addresses how to resolve insecure storage vulnerabilities, which is exactly what this rule is designed to detect. The FAQ's discussion of 'insecure storage vulnerabilities' and guidance on 'replacing public custom settings with protected ones' directly relates to the rule's purpose of identifying sensitive data protection issues in Salesforce applications.