Are non-secret identifiers like idempotency keys considered sensitive data that requires secure storage?
Answer
Non-secret identifiers like idempotency keys are generally not considered sensitive data that requires secure storage. However, their classification can depend on the specific use case and the associated threat model. It's important to evaluate the context in which these identifiers are used and ensure they are not exposed in ways that could lead to misuse or unauthorized access.
Are non-secret identifiers like idempotency keys considered sensitive data that requires secure storage?
Recommended Answer Update
Non-secret identifiers like idempotency keys are generally not considered sensitive data that requires secure storage. However, their classification can depend on your specific use case and threat model. Evaluate the context in which these identifiers are used and ensure they're not exposed in ways that could lead to misuse or unauthorized access.
Reasoning
The original answer was generally accurate but could be improved for clarity and directness. Changes made: (1) Replaced 'the specific use case and the associated threat model' with 'your specific use case and threat model' to make it more direct and user-focused, (2) Changed 'It's important to evaluate' to 'Evaluate' for a more conversational, active tone, and (3) Replaced 'they are not exposed' with 'they're not exposed' using contractions per the style guide. The selected rule ProtectSensitiveData is directly relevant because this FAQ discusses data classification and secure storage requirements. The FAQ content 'Non-secret identifiers like idempotency keys are generally not considered sensitive data that requires secure storage' and the guidance about evaluating context and preventing misuse directly relates to the ProtectSensitiveData rule's purpose of ensuring sensitive information is properly handled and secured.