The current FAQ content is accurate and well-structured, addressing the specific challenge of transitioning from public to protected custom metadata while maintaining functionality. No outdated content was detected - the information aligns with current Salesforce security best practices. The answer appropriately covers the key aspects of this transition including security considerations, user impact, and implementation steps.
I selected four related security rules that directly connect to the FAQ's content:
1. **ApexSuggestUsingNamedCred** - This rule is highly relevant because the FAQ specifically mentions 'consider alternatives like encryption or Named Credentials' in step 2. The rule focuses on suggesting Named Credentials for secure credential storage, which directly aligns with the FAQ's recommendation for handling sensitive data alternatives when protected metadata doesn't meet use cases.
2. **AvoidHardcodedCredentialsInFieldDecls** - This relates to the FAQ's emphasis on storing sensitive data securely in step 1 and the overall theme of preventing exposure to unauthorized users. The rule addresses avoiding hardcoded credentials in field declarations, which connects to the FAQ's guidance on secure data storage practices.
3. **AvoidHardcodedCredentialsInVarAssign** - Connected to the FAQ's security focus in steps 1 and 4 regarding secure data handling and restricting access to sensitive data. This rule complements the FAQ's guidance on proper credential management practices.
4. **AvoidHardcodedCredentialsInVarDecls** - Also relates to the secure data storage principles discussed in steps 1 and 4 of the FAQ, supporting the overall security posture when transitioning to protected metadata.
No significant changes were needed as the content is clear, accurate, and follows security best practices. The answer maintains appropriate scope and detail level for the question asked.