The FAQ content is accurate and well-structured, addressing a common scenario during security reviews. Only minor improvements were made to enhance clarity and conversational tone: changed 'Seek Assistance' to 'Get Help' for more natural language, and simplified 'you can refer to' to just 'refer to' to reduce wordiness. The content appropriately covers the proper approach to handling legacy code security issues.
No security rules were selected because this FAQ addresses process and documentation aspects of handling legacy code during security review, rather than specific code vulnerability detection or prevention that the available rules focus on. The security rules in the list are primarily designed to detect specific vulnerabilities in active code (like SOQL injection, XSS, CRUD violations, etc.), while this FAQ deals with the administrative process of documenting and explaining why flagged code in unused/legacy sections should be considered false positives.