Is it acceptable to have commented-out code or unused objects and fields in a package submitted for review?
Answer
Commented-out code or unused objects and fields should not be included in a package submitted for review. It's best to remove these elements to ensure the package is clean, efficient, and follows best practices.
Enhancing FAQ...
Enhancing FAQ with AI recommendations...
AI Recommended Enhancement
Question
Is it acceptable to have commented-out code or unused objects and fields in a package submitted for review?
Recommended Answer Update
Commented-out code or unused objects and fields shouldn't be included in a package submitted for review. It's best to remove these elements to ensure the package is clean, efficient, and follows best practices.
Reasoning
The original answer uses 'should not be included' which sounds overly formal and corporate. The recommended update uses 'shouldn't be included' to follow the conversational tone guidelines with contractions. This makes the response sound more natural and friendly while maintaining the same meaning and all original points. No security rules are associated with this FAQ because it addresses general code cleanup and package hygiene practices rather than specific security vulnerabilities or enforcement mechanisms that the available security scanner rules detect.