FAQ-000368 - Code Quality vs Security Vulnerabilities / Unused and Obsolete Code Management

Current Status:VALID_RESPONSEErrorUnable to AnswerSuggests Case

Current FAQ

Question
Is it acceptable to comment out incomplete code in production packages or must it be completely removed?
Answer
Incomplete code in production packages must be completely removed rather than commented out. Commenting it out isn't sufficient, as it can still pose risks or cause confusion. It's best to remove unused or incomplete components entirely to ensure code quality and security.
Enhancing FAQ...

Enhancing FAQ with AI recommendations...

AI Recommended Enhancement

Question
Is it acceptable to comment out incomplete code in production packages or must it be completely removed?
Recommended Answer Update
Incomplete code in production packages must be completely removed rather than commented out. Commenting it out isn't sufficient, as it can still pose risks or cause confusion. Remove unused or incomplete components entirely to ensure code quality and security.
Reasoning
The original answer was clear and accurate but used unnecessarily verbose phrasing that could be streamlined without losing meaning. Changed 'It's best to remove' to the more direct 'Remove' to follow the brand guidelines of being concise and direct. The content about removing incomplete code is correct and aligns with general code quality best practices. No security rules were selected because this FAQ addresses general code quality practices rather than specific security vulnerabilities that would be caught by security scanners. The available rules focus on specific security issues like SOQL injection, XSS, CRUD violations, etc., while this FAQ discusses general development hygiene of removing incomplete code, which is more of a code quality concern than a specific security vulnerability pattern.