The answer was improved for clarity and tone by using contractions (don't, aren't, can't) and more conversational language as specified in the brand guidelines. The core message and structure remain unchanged - just refined for better readability while maintaining all original points about code quality vs security concerns, the scan process, and handling false positives.
Regarding security rules: ApexCRUDViolation was selected because this rule detects missing CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) permission checks in Apex code, which is a security concern that would be flagged by static analysis tools during the security review process. The FAQ discusses how static analysis tools identify different types of issues, and CRUD violations would be among the security-related findings that need attention. ApexSharingViolations was selected because this rule identifies sharing rule violations in Apex code, another category of security issue that static analysis would detect. The FAQ's distinction between "code quality issues" and actual security concerns directly relates to these types of security rules that would require fixes versus performance-related issues that might not.