The FAQ content is accurate and well-structured. I made a minor improvement by changing 'do not require' to the more conversational contraction 'don't require' to align with the writing style guidelines for being conversational and using contractions. The existing structure, technical accuracy, and all four main points are preserved.
The two selected security rules directly relate to the FAQ content:
1. **ApexCSRF**: This rule specifically detects CSRF vulnerabilities in Apex code, which directly relates to points 1 and 3 in the FAQ that discuss 'State Change or DML Operations During Initialization' and 'Improper Triggering of Operations in Apex Controllers.' The FAQ explains exactly the scenarios this rule would flag - DML operations being performed at inappropriate times that bypass CSRF protection.
2. **VfCsrf**: This rule focuses on CSRF vulnerabilities in Visualforce pages, which directly corresponds to points 1, 2, and 4 in the FAQ. Point 2 specifically mentions the 'confirmationTokenRequired' metadata field for Visualforce pages, point 1 discusses DML operations during page initialization in Visualforce, and point 4 addresses 'Unprotected JavaScript Actions' in Visualforce pages. All of these are exactly the types of CSRF vulnerabilities this rule would detect.